Brunei Darussalam vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 74.44 against 73.62 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.82.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 54th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 51st of 191 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 74.44 against 73.62 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.82, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 54th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 51st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.