Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Brunei

Brunei: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 73.62 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
73.62
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
54th
of 191 countries
All-time high
73.62
in 2017
All-time low
70.04
in 2016
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Brunei, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 71.72015: 71.72016: 702017: 73.62018: 73.52019: 73.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Brunei recorded 73.62 for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in 2019.

That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 2.7% over ten years.

Brunei ranks 54th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Brunei, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Brunei, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 71.68 —
2015 71.65 -0.0%
2016 70.04 -2.3%
2017 73.62 +5.1%
2018 73.49 -0.2%
2019 73.62 +0.2%

Brunei compared with similar countries

  • Brunei's 73.62 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Brunei's 73.62 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 71.5, 1.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Brunei

  1. 51 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 74.44 compare
  2. 52 France 74.29 compare
  3. 53 Turkey 73.83 compare
  4. 55 Nigeria 73.61 compare
  5. 56 Latvia 73.51 compare
  6. 57 Malta 73.49 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Brunei

All data for Brunei →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Brunei?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Brunei was 73.62 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Brunei?
The highest recorded value was 73.62 in 2017.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Brunei?
The lowest recorded value was 70.04 in 2016.
How does Brunei rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Brunei ranks 54th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Brunei?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Brunei data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Brunei. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/brunei-darussalam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/brunei-darussalam/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Brunei</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.