China vs Israel: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Israel
How they compare
China currently reports 77.33 against 76.69 in Israel, a difference of 0.64.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Israel ahead.
China ranks 33rd and Israel ranks 35th of 188 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, China or Israel?
- China, at 77.33 against 76.69 in Israel as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between China and Israel?
- 0.64, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Israel?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Israel rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 33rd and Israel ranks 35th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.