Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in China

China: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 77.33 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
77.33
Change on year
up 18.6%
World rank
33rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
77.33
in 2019
All-time low
38
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in China, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 382015: 39.62016: 39.92017: 41.22018: 65.22019: 77.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in China is 77.33, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is up 18.6% on the previous year and up 103.5% over ten years.

China ranks 33rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in China, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in China, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 38 —
2015 39.57 +4.1%
2016 39.89 +0.8%
2017 41.21 +3.3%
2018 65.2 +58.2%
2019 77.33 +18.6%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 77.33 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 70.92, 1.1× the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • China's 77.33 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 71.5, 1.1× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near China

  1. 30 Germany 78.2 compare
  2. 31 Sweden 78.05 compare
  3. 32 Tunisia 77.38 compare
  4. 34 Thailand 77.26 compare
  5. 35 Israel 76.69 compare
  6. 36 Ireland 76.58 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in China?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in China was 77.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 77.33 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 38 in 2014.
How does China rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
China ranks 33rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is up 103.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/china/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.