Côte d'Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 57.92 against 57.41 in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.51.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 149th of 190 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Côte d'Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 57.92 against 57.41 in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.51, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 152nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 149th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.