Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Denmark
87.88
in 2019
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
93.47
in 2019
Denmark rank
4th
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
1st

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Denmark
  • Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China currently reports 93.47 against 87.88 in Denmark, a difference of 5.59.

That makes Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 4th and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st of 190 countries.

Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Denmark or Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, at 93.47 against 87.88 in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
5.59, with Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Denmark and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Denmark ranks 4th and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 1st of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/denmark/hong-kong-sar-china/">Denmark vs Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.