Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 93.47 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
93.47
Change on year
up 2.4%
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
93.47
in 2019
All-time low
91.17
in 2015
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong, 2014–2019

0204060801002014201620192014: 91.22015: 91.22016: 91.22017: 91.22018: 91.22019: 93.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Hong Kong stood at 93.47. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 2.4% on the previous year and up 2.5% over ten years.

That places Hong Kong 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 91.22 —
2015 91.17 -0.0%
2016 91.19 +0.0%
2017 91.21 +0.0%
2018 91.24 +0.0%
2019 93.47 +2.4%

Hong Kong compared with similar countries

  • Hong Kong's 93.47 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.3× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Hong Kong's 93.47 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 71.5, 1.3× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 2 Malaysia 89.92 compare
  2. 3 United Arab Emirates 89.75 compare
  3. 4 Denmark 87.88 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Hong Kong?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Hong Kong was 93.47 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 93.47 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 91.17 in 2015.
How does Hong Kong rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Hong Kong ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Hong Kong?
Over the last ten years it is up 2.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/hong-kong-sar-china/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Hong Kong</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.