El Salvador vs Lesotho: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

El Salvador
52.35
in 2019
Lesotho
52.95
in 2019
El Salvador rank
166th
Lesotho rank
163rd

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • El Salvador
  • Lesotho
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 52.95 against 52.35 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.6.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 166th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 188 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, El Salvador or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 52.95 against 52.35 in El Salvador as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between El Salvador and Lesotho?
0.6, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Lesotho?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Lesotho rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
El Salvador ranks 166th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.