Equatorial Guinea vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) currently reports 55.29 against 55.01 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 160th of 191 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), at 55.29 against 55.01 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0.28, with Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 163rd and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 160th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.