Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Lesotho
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 55.01 against 52.95 in Lesotho, a difference of 2.06.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Lesotho?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 55.01 against 52.95 in Lesotho as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 2.06, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th and Lesotho ranks 163rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.