Grenada vs Uzbekistan: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Grenada
62.49
in 2019
Uzbekistan
61.68
in 2019
Grenada rank
129th
Uzbekistan rank
131st

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Grenada
  • Uzbekistan
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 62.49 against 61.68 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.81.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 129th and Uzbekistan ranks 131st of 188 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Grenada or Uzbekistan?
Grenada, at 62.49 against 61.68 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Grenada and Uzbekistan?
0.81, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Uzbekistan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Uzbekistan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Grenada ranks 129th and Uzbekistan ranks 131st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.