Hong Kong vs Malaysia: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong
- Malaysia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 93.47 against 89.92 in Malaysia, a difference of 3.55.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Hong Kong or Malaysia?
- Hong Kong, at 93.47 against 89.92 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Hong Kong and Malaysia?
- 3.55, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malaysia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong and Malaysia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong ranks 1st and Malaysia ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.