Japan vs North Macedonia: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Japan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 83.55 against 83.09 in Japan, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 18th and North Macedonia ranks 15th of 190 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Japan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 83.55 against 83.09 in Japan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Japan and North Macedonia?
- 0.46, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Japan and North Macedonia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Japan ranks 18th and North Macedonia ranks 15th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.