Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan

Japan: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 83.09 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
83.09
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
18th
of 191 countries
All-time high
83.09
in 2019
All-time low
83.03
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 832015: 832016: 83.12017: 83.12018: 83.12019: 83.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Japan is 83.09, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% over ten years.

That places Japan 18th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 83.03 —
2015 83.04 +0.0%
2016 83.05 +0.0%
2017 83.08 +0.0%
2018 83.09 +0.0%
2019 83.09 +0.0%

Japan compared with similar countries

  • Japan's 83.09 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Japan's 83.09 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 71.5, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 15 North Macedonia 83.55 compare
  2. 16 Morocco 83.25 compare
  3. 17 Bahrain 83.13 compare
  4. 19 Estonia 82.55 compare
  5. 20 Ukraine 81.14 compare
  6. 21 Georgia 80.98 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Japan?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Japan was 83.09 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 83.09 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 83.03 in 2014.
How does Japan rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Japan ranks 18th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/japan/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.