Jordan vs Micronesia, Fed. Sts.: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Jordan
- Micronesia, Fed. Sts.
How they compare
Micronesia, Fed. Sts. currently reports 61.03 against 60.33 in Jordan, a difference of 0.7.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 137th and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 135th of 188 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Jordan or Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
- Micronesia, Fed. Sts., at 61.03 against 60.33 in Jordan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Jordan and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
- 0.7, with Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Micronesia, Fed. Sts.?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Jordan and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Jordan ranks 137th and Micronesia, Fed. Sts. ranks 135th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.