Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Jordan

Jordan: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 60.33 in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
60.33
Change on year
up 0.7%
World rank
138th
of 191 countries
All-time high
65.05
in 2015
All-time low
59.89
in 2018
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Jordan, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 64.62015: 65.12016: 642017: 61.72018: 59.92019: 60.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Jordan is 60.33, measured in 2019.

That represents a change of up 0.7% on the previous year and down 6.6% over ten years.

Jordan ranks 138th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Jordan, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Jordan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 64.62 —
2015 65.05 +0.7%
2016 64.01 -1.6%
2017 61.7 -3.6%
2018 59.89 -2.9%
2019 60.33 +0.7%

Jordan compared with similar countries

  • Jordan's 60.33 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 70.92, 85% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Jordan's 60.33 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 71.16, 85% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Jordan

  1. 135 Bangladesh 61.05 compare
  2. 136 Micronesia (country) 61.03 compare
  3. 137 Tajikistan 60.85 compare
  4. 139 Bolivia 60.04 compare
  5. 140 Zimbabwe 60 compare
  6. 141 Gabon 59.78 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Jordan

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Jordan?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Jordan was 60.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Jordan?
The highest recorded value was 65.05 in 2015.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Jordan?
The lowest recorded value was 59.89 in 2018.
How does Jordan rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Jordan ranks 138th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Jordan?
Over the last ten years it is down 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Jordan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Jordan. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/jordan/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Jordan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.