Kiribati vs South Sudan: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- South Sudan
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 52.2 against 50.51 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.69.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Sudan ahead.
Kiribati ranks 169th and South Sudan ranks 171st of 190 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Kiribati or South Sudan?
- Kiribati, at 52.2 against 50.51 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Kiribati and South Sudan?
- 1.69, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Kiribati and South Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 169th and South Sudan ranks 171st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.