Korea, Rep. vs Lithuania: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Korea, Rep.
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 84.87 against 84.44 in Korea, Rep., a difference of 0.43.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Lithuania ahead.
Korea, Rep. ranks 12th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 188 countries.
Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Korea, Rep. or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 84.87 against 84.44 in Korea, Rep. as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Korea, Rep. and Lithuania?
- 0.43, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea, Rep. and Lithuania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Korea, Rep. and Lithuania rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Korea, Rep. ranks 12th and Lithuania ranks 10th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.