Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Korea

South Korea: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 84.44 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
84.44
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
12th
of 191 countries
All-time high
84.54
in 2016
All-time low
77.82
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Korea, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 77.82015: 77.92016: 84.52017: 84.42018: 84.42019: 84.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in South Korea is 84.44, measured in 2019.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 8.5% over ten years.

South Korea ranks 12th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Korea, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Korea, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 77.82 —
2015 77.86 +0.1%
2016 84.54 +8.6%
2017 84.41 -0.2%
2018 84.43 +0.0%
2019 84.44 +0.0%

South Korea compared with similar countries

  • South Korea's 84.44 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • South Korea's 84.44 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 71.5, 1.2× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near South Korea

  1. 9 Serbia 85.29 compare
  2. 10 Lithuania 84.87 compare
  3. 11 Australia 84.74 compare
  4. 13 Qatar 84.16 compare
  5. 14 Luxembourg 83.87 compare
  6. 15 North Macedonia 83.55 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for South Korea

All data for South Korea →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in South Korea?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in South Korea was 84.44 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in South Korea?
The highest recorded value was 84.54 in 2016.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in South Korea?
The lowest recorded value was 77.82 in 2014.
How does South Korea rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
South Korea ranks 12th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in South Korea?
Over the last ten years it is up 8.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Korea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Korea. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/korea-rep/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in South Korea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.