South Korea vs Luxembourg: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

South Korea
84.44
in 2019
Luxembourg
83.87
in 2019
South Korea rank
12th
Luxembourg rank
14th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • Luxembourg
020406080201420162019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 84.44 against 83.87 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.57.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Luxembourg ahead.

South Korea ranks 12th and Luxembourg ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, South Korea or Luxembourg?
South Korea, at 84.44 against 83.87 in Luxembourg as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between South Korea and Luxembourg?
0.57, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Luxembourg?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Luxembourg rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
South Korea ranks 12th and Luxembourg ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.