Mongolia vs Tunisia: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
78.21
in 2019
Tunisia
77.38
in 2019
Mongolia rank
29th
Tunisia rank
32nd

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Tunisia
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 78.21 against 77.38 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.83.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 32nd of 188 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Tunisia?
Mongolia, at 78.21 against 77.38 in Tunisia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Tunisia?
0.83, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tunisia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and Tunisia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 29th and Tunisia ranks 32nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.