Saudi Arabia vs Sweden: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Saudi Arabia
78.35
in 2019
Sweden
78.05
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
28th
Sweden rank
31st

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Sweden
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 78.35 against 78.05 in Sweden, a difference of 0.3.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Sweden ahead.

Saudi Arabia ranks 28th and Sweden ranks 31st of 188 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Saudi Arabia or Sweden?
Saudi Arabia, at 78.35 against 78.05 in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
0.3, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sweden?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Saudi Arabia and Sweden rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Saudi Arabia ranks 28th and Sweden ranks 31st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.