Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sweden

Sweden: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 78.05 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
78.05
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
31st
of 191 countries
All-time high
78.05
in 2019
All-time low
77.48
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sweden, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 77.52015: 77.72016: 77.82017: 77.92018: 782019: 78

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Sweden stood at 78.05. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.7% over ten years.

Sweden ranks 31st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sweden, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sweden, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 77.48 —
2015 77.68 +0.3%
2016 77.78 +0.1%
2017 77.89 +0.1%
2018 77.97 +0.1%
2019 78.05 +0.1%

Sweden compared with similar countries

  • Sweden's 78.05 is above the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 1.1× the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Sweden's 78.05 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.51, 1.1× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Sweden

  1. 28 Saudi Arabia 78.35 compare
  2. 29 Mongolia 78.21 compare
  3. 30 Germany 78.2 compare
  4. 32 Tunisia 77.38 compare
  5. 33 China 77.33 compare
  6. 34 Thailand 77.26 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Sweden

All data for Sweden →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Sweden?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Sweden was 78.05 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sweden?
The highest recorded value was 78.05 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Sweden?
The lowest recorded value was 77.48 in 2014.
How does Sweden rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Sweden ranks 31st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Sweden?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Sweden data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sweden. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/sweden/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Sweden</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.