Poland vs South Sudan: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction over time
- Poland
- South Sudan
How they compare
Poland currently reports 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Sudan, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 135th and South Sudan ranks 135th of 186 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction, Poland or South Sudan?
- Poland, at 2 DB16-20 methodology against 2 DB16-20 methodology in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction between Poland and South Sudan?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Poland and South Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Poland ranks 135th and South Sudan ranks 135th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.