Dealing with construction: Quality control after in South Sudan
South Sudan: Dealing with construction: Quality control after was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Latest (2019)
2 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
135th
of 186 countries
All-time high
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in South Sudan, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in South Sudan stood at 2 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
That places South Sudan 135th out of 186 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Dealing with construction: Quality control after in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
South Sudan compared with similar countries
- South Sudan's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for low income countries, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (20 countries reporting)
- South Sudan's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 2 DB16-20 methodology, 1.0× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 132 Nigeria 2.77 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 133 Brazil 2.39 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 134 Mexico 2.17 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Angola 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Bolivia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Burundi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Central African Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Comoros 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cote d'Ivoire 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Dominica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Ethiopia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Gabon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Gambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Germany 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Ghana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Iraq 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Jamaica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Lesotho 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Mauritania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Niger 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Poland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Solomon Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 East Timor 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Zambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for South Sudan
- Merchandise trade 37.2% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 1.27 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 1.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Merchandise exports 955.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 383.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 78.35 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 7.18 % change on previous year (2025)
- Merchandise imports (current US$), per capita 104.28 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise imports (current US$), annual growth rate 7.08 % change on previous year (2025)
- Transport services 63.4% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in South Sudan?
- Dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in South Sudan was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does South Sudan rank for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- South Sudan ranks 135th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction rising or falling in South Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.