Dealing with construction: Quality control after in Poland
Poland: Dealing with construction: Quality control after was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▼ Falling
Latest (2019)
2 DB16-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
135th
of 186 countries
All-time high
3 DB16-20 methodology
in 2014
All-time low
2 DB16-20 methodology
in 2016
Years of data
6
2014–2019
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction in Poland, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Poland is 2 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is down 33.3% over ten years.
Poland ranks 135th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Dealing with construction: Quality control after in Poland, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 3 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | -33.3% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Poland's 2 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 3 DB16-20 methodology, 67% of the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Poland
- 132 Nigeria 2.77 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 133 Brazil 2.39 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 134 Mexico 2.17 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Angola 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Bolivia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Burundi 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cambodia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Central African Republic 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Comoros 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Democratic Republic of Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Cote d'Ivoire 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Dominica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Ethiopia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Gabon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Gambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Germany 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Ghana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Grenada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guinea 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guinea-Bissau 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Guyana 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Haiti 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Iraq 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Jamaica 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Kenya 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Kiribati 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Lesotho 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Madagascar 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Mali 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Mauritania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Niger 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Sao Tome and Principe 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Solomon Islands 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 South Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Sudan 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Suriname 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 East Timor 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Zambia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Poland
- Merchandise trade 80.6% (2025)
- Food imports 9.9% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 77.0% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 420.91 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 86.33 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 15.6% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 77.8% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 413.89 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 130.41 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 11,360 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Poland?
- Dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction in Poland was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 3 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2016.
- How does Poland rank for dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction?
- Poland ranks 135th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: quality control after construction rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 33.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality control after construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality control after construction index evaluates quality control after the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether a final inspection is mandated by law to verify that the building was built in accordance with the approved plans and existing building regulations; and (ii) whether the final inspection is implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.