Central African Republic vs Guyana: Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during
Central African Republic
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Guyana
1 DB16-20 methodology
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
138th
Guyana rank
138th
Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during over time
- Central African Republic
- Guyana
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Guyana, a difference of 0 DB16-20 methodology.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 138th and Guyana ranks 138th of 185 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: quality control during, Central African Republic or Guyana?
- Central African Republic, at 1 DB16-20 methodology against 1 DB16-20 methodology in Guyana as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: quality control during between Central African Republic and Guyana?
- 0 DB16-20 methodology, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Guyana?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Guyana rank globally for dealing with construction permits: quality control during?
- Central African Republic ranks 138th and Guyana ranks 138th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Quality control during construction index (0-3) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The quality control during construction index evaluates quality control during the construction process. It has two components: (i) whether inspections are mandated by law during the construction process; (ii) whether inspections during construction are implemented in practice. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.