Botswana vs Saudi Arabia: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score

Botswana
78.1
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
78.67
in 2019
Botswana rank
47th
Saudi Arabia rank
44th

Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Saudi Arabia
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 78.67 against 78.1 in Botswana, a difference of 0.57.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Botswana ranks 47th and Saudi Arabia ranks 44th of 188 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 50.14 64.9 14.76 Saudi Arabia
2010s 68.96 76.97 8.01 Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Botswana or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 78.67 against 78.1 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Botswana and Saudi Arabia?
0.57, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Saudi Arabia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Saudi Arabia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
Botswana ranks 47th and Saudi Arabia ranks 44th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.