Marshall Islands vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score
Marshall Islands
96.54
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
93.8
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
3rd
United Arab Emirates rank
5th
Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score over time
- Marshall Islands
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 96.54 against 93.8 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 2.74.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 3rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.22 | 85.56 | 6.66 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 95.68 | 93.59 | 2.09 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score, Marshall Islands or United Arab Emirates?
- Marshall Islands, at 96.54 against 93.8 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score between Marshall Islands and United Arab Emirates?
- 2.74, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and United Arab Emirates?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: time (days) - score?
- Marshall Islands ranks 3rd and United Arab Emirates ranks 5th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Time (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.