Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Dominica

Dominica: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 70.08 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
70.08
Change on year
down 0.0%
World rank
83rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
70.09
in 2018
All-time low
70.07
in 2016
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Dominica, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 70.12015: 70.12016: 70.12017: 70.12018: 70.12019: 70.1

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Dominica recorded 70.08 for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in 2019.

That represents a change of up 0.0% over ten years.

Dominica ranks 83rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Dominica, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Dominica, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 70.07 —
2015 70.08 +0.0%
2016 70.07 -0.0%
2017 70.07 +0.0%
2018 70.09 +0.0%
2019 70.08 -0.0%

Dominica compared with similar countries

  • Dominica's 70.08 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 70.92, 99% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Dominica's 70.08 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 65.74, 1.1× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Dominica

  1. 80 Dominican Republic 70.75 compare
  2. 81 Rwanda 70.64 compare
  3. 82 Benin 70.54 compare
  4. 84 Namibia 69.97 compare
  5. 85 Philippines 69.96 compare
  6. 86 Greece 69.53 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Dominica

All data for Dominica →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Dominica?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Dominica was 70.08 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Dominica?
The highest recorded value was 70.09 in 2018.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Dominica?
The lowest recorded value was 70.07 in 2016.
How does Dominica rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Dominica ranks 83rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Dominica?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Dominica data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Dominica. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/dominica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/dominica/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Dominica</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.