Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Egypt

Egypt: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 71.16 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
71.16
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
74th
of 191 countries
All-time high
71.35
in 2017
All-time low
70.61
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Egypt, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 70.62015: 70.92016: 71.22017: 71.42018: 70.82019: 71.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Egypt stood at 71.16.

That represents a change of up 0.6% on the previous year and up 0.8% over ten years.

Egypt ranks 74th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Egypt, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Egypt, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 70.61 —
2015 70.94 +0.5%
2016 71.23 +0.4%
2017 71.35 +0.2%
2018 70.75 -0.8%
2019 71.16 +0.6%

Egypt compared with similar countries

  • Egypt's 71.16 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 64.54, 1.1× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Egypt's 71.16 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 71.16, 1.0× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Egypt

  1. 71 Switzerland 71.76 compare
  2. 72 Iceland 71.56 compare
  3. 73 Iran 71.18 compare
  4. 75 Paraguay 71.11 compare
  5. 76 Marshall Islands 71.09 compare
  6. 77 Bahamas 70.9 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Egypt

All data for Egypt →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Egypt?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Egypt was 71.16 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Egypt?
The highest recorded value was 71.35 in 2017.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Egypt?
The lowest recorded value was 70.61 in 2014.
How does Egypt rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Egypt ranks 74th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Egypt?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Egypt data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Egypt. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/egypt-arab-rep/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Egypt</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.