Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Italy

Italy: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 68.33 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
68.33
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
97th
of 191 countries
All-time high
68.33
in 2019
All-time low
65.61
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Italy, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 65.62015: 65.72016: 65.82017: 682018: 68.22019: 68.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Italy recorded 68.33 for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.2% on the previous year and up 4.1% over ten years.

Italy ranks 97th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Italy, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Italy, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 65.61 —
2015 65.69 +0.1%
2016 65.79 +0.2%
2017 68.04 +3.4%
2018 68.17 +0.2%
2019 68.33 +0.2%

Italy compared with similar countries

  • Italy's 68.33 is below the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 93% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Italy's 68.33 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.51, 93% of the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Italy

  1. 94 Samoa 68.81 compare
  2. 95 Burkina Faso 68.68 compare
  3. 96 Eswatini 68.66 compare
  4. 98 South Africa 68.32 compare
  5. 99 Laos 68.28 compare
  6. 100 Panama 68.24 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Italy

All data for Italy →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Italy?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Italy was 68.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Italy?
The highest recorded value was 68.33 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Italy?
The lowest recorded value was 65.61 in 2014.
How does Italy rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Italy ranks 97th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Italy?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Italy data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Italy. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/italy/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Italy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.