Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations in Cape Verde
Cape Verde: Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations in Cape Verde, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations in Cape Verde is 1 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Cape Verde ranks 144th of 186 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations in Cape Verde, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2017 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Cape Verde
- 144 Afghanistan 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Angola 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Bolivia 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Burkina Faso 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Burundi 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Cyprus 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Ecuador 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Germany 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Greece 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Grenada 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Guyana 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Haiti 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Honduras 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Iraq 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Lesotho 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Mali 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Marshall Islands 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Moldova 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Montenegro 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Mozambique 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Paraguay 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Poland 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Samoa 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Sierra Leone 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Suriname 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 144 Vanuatu 1 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Cape Verde
- Merchandise trade 70.0% (2025)
- Food imports 32.6% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 50.8% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 2.04 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 86.4% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 13.6% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 96.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 182.05 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0314 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 23.08 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations in Cape Verde?
- Dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations in Cape Verde was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations recorded in Cape Verde?
- The highest recorded value was 1 DB16-20 methodology in 2017.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations recorded in Cape Verde?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Cape Verde rank for dealing with construction permits: quality of building regulations?
- Cape Verde ranks 144th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Cape Verde data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Quality of building regulations index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The quality of building regulations index evaluates the accessibility and transparency of building regulations. It has two components: (i) whether building regulations are easily accessible; and (ii) whether the requirements for obtaining a building permit are clearly specified. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.