Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) was 66.67 in 2013. ◆ Volatile
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Sao Tome and Principe, 2004–2013
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Sao Tome and Principe recorded 66.67 for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in 2013. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Over the whole period, getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Sao Tome and Principe peaked at 66.67 in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2004.
That places Sao Tome and Principe 85th out of 184 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14) in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 | 0 | — |
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | — |
| 2009 | 0 | — |
| 2010 | 0 | — |
| 2011 | 0 | — |
| 2012 | 0 | — |
| 2013 | 66.67 | — |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 2010s | 16.67 | 0 | 66.67 | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
- 85 Bahrain 66.67 compare
- 85 Belgium 66.67 compare
- 85 Bosnia and Herzegovina 66.67 compare
- 85 Brunei Darussalam 66.67 compare
- 85 Bulgaria 66.67 compare
- 85 Cambodia 66.67 compare
- 85 Denmark 66.67 compare
- 85 Eswatini 66.67 compare
- 85 Fiji 66.67 compare
- 85 Finland 66.67 compare
- 85 France 66.67 compare
- 85 Hungary 66.67 compare
- 85 Kyrgyzstan 66.67 compare
- 85 Maldives 66.67 compare
- 85 Montenegro 66.67 compare
- 85 Namibia 66.67 compare
- 85 Netherlands 66.67 compare
- 85 Norway 66.67 compare
- 85 Philippines 66.67 compare
- 85 Qatar 66.67 compare
- 85 Slovakia 66.67 compare
- 85 Sweden 66.67 compare
- 85 Trinidad and Tobago 66.67 compare
- 85 Tunisia 66.67 compare
- 85 Viet Nam 66.67 compare
More private sector data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Merchandise trade 22.5% (2025)
- Food imports 31.8% (2023)
- Manufactures imports 37.1% (2023)
- Merchandise imports 183.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 98.2% (2023)
- Manufactures exports 1.5% (2023)
- Merchandise exports 38.00 million current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 158.17 current US$ per person (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per unit of GDP 0.0387 current US$ per US$ of GDP (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), annual growth rate 31.03 % change on previous year (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) in Sao Tome and Principe was 66.67 in 2013, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 66.67 in 2013.
- What is the lowest getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14) recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2004.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for getting credit: depth of credit information index (0-6) (db05-14)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th out of 184 countries with data for 2013.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting credit: Depth of credit information index (0-6) (DB05-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the depth of credit information benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB05-14 studies.