Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Denmark

Denmark: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score was 83.33 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
83.33
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 188 countries
All-time high
83.33
in 2009
All-time low
83.33
in 2009
Years of data
11
2009–2019

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Denmark, 2009–2019

0204060802009201420192009: 83.32010: 83.32011: 83.32012: 83.32013: 83.32014: 83.32015: 83.32016: 83.32017: 83.32018: 83.32019: 83.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Denmark is 83.33, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Denmark peaked at 83.33 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 83.33, in 2009.

Denmark ranks 30th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 83.33 83.33 83.33 1
2010s 83.33 83.33 83.33 10

Countries ranked near Denmark

  1. 29 India 92.17 compare
  2. 30 Indonesia 83.33 compare
  3. 30 Antigua and Barbuda 83.33 compare
  4. 30 Bhutan 83.33 compare
  5. 30 Burkina Faso 83.33 compare
  6. 30 Cambodia 83.33 compare
  7. 30 Cameroon 83.33 compare
  8. 30 Croatia 83.33 compare
  9. 30 Ethiopia 83.33 compare
  10. 30 Fiji 83.33 compare
  11. 30 France 83.33 compare
  12. 30 Ghana 83.33 compare
  13. 30 Guinea 83.33 compare
  14. 30 Haiti 83.33 compare
  15. 30 Iceland 83.33 compare
  16. 30 Italy 83.33 compare
  17. 30 Latvia 83.33 compare
  18. 30 Lebanon 83.33 compare
  19. 30 Liberia 83.33 compare
  20. 30 Libya 83.33 compare
  21. 30 Mali 83.33 compare
  22. 30 Malta 83.33 compare
  23. 30 Morocco 83.33 compare
  24. 30 Mozambique 83.33 compare
  25. 30 Niger 83.33 compare
  26. 30 Norway 83.33 compare
  27. 30 Papua New Guinea 83.33 compare
  28. 30 Philippines 83.33 compare
  29. 30 Poland 83.33 compare
  30. 30 Qatar 83.33 compare
  31. 30 Rwanda 83.33 compare
  32. 30 Samoa 83.33 compare
  33. 30 Sao Tome and Principe 83.33 compare
  34. 30 Singapore 83.33 compare
  35. 30 Solomon Islands 83.33 compare
  36. 30 Saint Kitts and Nevis 83.33 compare
  37. 30 Suriname 83.33 compare
  38. 30 Tanzania 83.33 compare
  39. 30 Trinidad and Tobago 83.33 compare
  40. 30 Tunisia 83.33 compare
  41. 30 Turkey 83.33 compare
  42. 30 Uzbekistan 83.33 compare
  43. 30 Vanuatu 83.33 compare
  44. 30 Vietnam 83.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More private sector data for Denmark

All data for Denmark →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Denmark?
Getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Denmark was 83.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Denmark?
The highest recorded value was 83.33 in 2009.
What is the lowest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Denmark?
The lowest recorded value was 83.33 in 2009.
How does Denmark rank for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Denmark ranks 30th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Denmark?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Denmark data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.