Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Mozambique

Mozambique: Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score was 83.33 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
83.33
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
30th
of 188 countries
All-time high
83.33
in 2018
All-time low
33.33
in 2011
Years of data
11
2009–2019

Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score in Mozambique, 2009–2019

0204060802009201420192009: 66.72010: 66.72011: 33.32012: 33.32013: 33.32014: 33.32015: 33.32016: 33.32017: 66.72018: 83.32019: 83.3

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Mozambique recorded 83.33 for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.

The figure is up 25.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Mozambique peaked at 83.33 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 33.33, in 2011.

Mozambique ranks 30th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 66.67 66.67 66.67 1
2010s 50 33.33 83.33 10

Countries ranked near Mozambique

  1. 29 India 92.17 compare
  2. 30 Indonesia 83.33 compare
  3. 30 Antigua and Barbuda 83.33 compare
  4. 30 Bhutan 83.33 compare
  5. 30 Burkina Faso 83.33 compare
  6. 30 Cambodia 83.33 compare
  7. 30 Cameroon 83.33 compare
  8. 30 Croatia 83.33 compare
  9. 30 Denmark 83.33 compare
  10. 30 Ethiopia 83.33 compare
  11. 30 Fiji 83.33 compare
  12. 30 France 83.33 compare
  13. 30 Ghana 83.33 compare
  14. 30 Guinea 83.33 compare
  15. 30 Haiti 83.33 compare
  16. 30 Iceland 83.33 compare
  17. 30 Italy 83.33 compare
  18. 30 Latvia 83.33 compare
  19. 30 Lebanon 83.33 compare
  20. 30 Liberia 83.33 compare
  21. 30 Libya 83.33 compare
  22. 30 Mali 83.33 compare
  23. 30 Malta 83.33 compare
  24. 30 Morocco 83.33 compare
  25. 30 Niger 83.33 compare
  26. 30 Norway 83.33 compare
  27. 30 Papua New Guinea 83.33 compare
  28. 30 Philippines 83.33 compare
  29. 30 Poland 83.33 compare
  30. 30 Qatar 83.33 compare
  31. 30 Rwanda 83.33 compare
  32. 30 Samoa 83.33 compare
  33. 30 Sao Tome and Principe 83.33 compare
  34. 30 Singapore 83.33 compare
  35. 30 Solomon Islands 83.33 compare
  36. 30 Saint Kitts and Nevis 83.33 compare
  37. 30 Suriname 83.33 compare
  38. 30 Tanzania 83.33 compare
  39. 30 Trinidad and Tobago 83.33 compare
  40. 30 Tunisia 83.33 compare
  41. 30 Turkey 83.33 compare
  42. 30 Uzbekistan 83.33 compare
  43. 30 Vanuatu 83.33 compare
  44. 30 Vietnam 83.33 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More private sector data for Mozambique

All data for Mozambique →

Frequently asked questions

What is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Mozambique?
Getting electricity: procedures (number) - score in Mozambique was 83.33 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Mozambique?
The highest recorded value was 83.33 in 2018.
What is the lowest getting electricity: procedures (number) - score recorded in Mozambique?
The lowest recorded value was 33.33 in 2011.
How does Mozambique rank for getting electricity: procedures (number) - score?
Mozambique ranks 30th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is getting electricity: procedures (number) - score rising or falling in Mozambique?
Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mozambique data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Getting electricity: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,068 data points, 2009–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.