Registering property: Equal access to property rights index (-2-0) (DB17-20 methodology) by country

The equal access to property rights index evaluates whether married or unmarried women have equal access to property rights. It has two components: (i) whether unmarried men and unmarΒ­ried women have equal ownership rights to property; and (ii) whether married men and married women have equal ownership rights to...

Countries reporting
186
Highest
0 DB17-20 methodology
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
Lowest
-2 DB17-20 methodology
Tonga
Median
0 DB17-20 methodology
Years covered
5
2015–2019
Data points
930

What the numbers show

Registering property: Equal access to property rights index (-2-0) (DB17-20 methodology) is currently reported for 186 countries. The highest value is 0 DB17-20 methodology in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of; the lowest is -2 DB17-20 methodology in Tonga.

The median across all reporting countries is 0 DB17-20 methodology, and the mean is -0.0806 DB17-20 methodology.

Registering property: Equal access to property rights index (-2-0): full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Angola 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Albania 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 United Arab Emirates 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Argentina 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Armenia, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Antigua and Barbuda 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Australia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Austria 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Azerbaijan, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Burundi 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Belgium 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Benin 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Burkina Faso 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bangladesh 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bulgaria 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bahrain, Kingdom of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bahamas, The 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Belarus, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Belize 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bolivia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Brazil 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Barbados 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Brunei Darussalam 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Bhutan 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Botswana 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Central African Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Canada 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Switzerland 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 China, People's Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Colombia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Comoros, Union of the 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Cabo Verde 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Costa Rica 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Cyprus 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Czech Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Germany 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Djibouti 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Dominica 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Denmark 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Dominican Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Algeria 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Ecuador 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” volatile
1 Egypt, Arab Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Eritrea, The State of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Spain 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Estonia, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Ethiopia, The Federal Democratic Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Finland 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Fiji, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 France 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 United Kingdom 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Georgia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Ghana 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Gambia, The 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Greece 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Grenada 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Guatemala 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Guyana 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Honduras 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Croatia, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Hungary 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Indonesia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 India 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Ireland 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Iran, Islamic Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Iraq 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Iceland 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Israel 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Italy 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Jamaica 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Jordan 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Japan 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Kazakhstan, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Kenya 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Kyrgyz Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Cambodia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 St. Kitts and Nevis 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Korea 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Kuwait 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Lao People's Democratic Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Lebanon 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Liberia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 St. Lucia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Sri Lanka 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Lesotho, Kingdom of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Lithuania 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Luxembourg 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Latvia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Morocco 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Moldova, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Madagascar, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Maldives 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Mexico 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 North Macedonia, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Mali 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Malta 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Myanmar 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Montenegro 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Mongolia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Mozambique, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Mauritius 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Malawi 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Malaysia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Namibia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Niger 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Nigeria 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Nicaragua 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Netherlands 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Norway 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Nepal 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 New Zealand 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Oman 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Pakistan 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Panama 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Peru 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Palau, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Papua New Guinea 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Poland 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Puerto Rico 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Portugal 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Paraguay 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Palestine 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Qatar 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Romania 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Russian Federation 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Rwanda 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Saudi Arabia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Sudan 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Senegal 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Singapore 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Solomon Islands 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Sierra Leone 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 El Salvador 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 San Marino, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Somalia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Serbia, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 South Sudan, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 SΓ£o TomΓ© and PrΓ­ncipe, Democratic Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Suriname 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Slovak Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Slovenia, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Sweden 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Eswatini, Kingdom of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Seychelles 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Syrian Arab Republic 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Togo 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Thailand 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Tajikistan, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Trinidad and Tobago 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Tunisia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 TΓΌrkiye, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Tanzania, United Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Uganda 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Ukraine 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Uruguay 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 United States 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Uzbekistan, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Venezuela, RepΓΊblica Bolivariana de 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Vietnam 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Vanuatu 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Samoa 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Kosovo 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Yemen, Republic of 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 South Africa 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Zambia 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Zimbabwe 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
1 Taiwan Province of China 0 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Chile -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 CΓ΄te d'Ivoire -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Cameroon -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Congo, Democratic Republic of the -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Congo, Republic of -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Gabon -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Guinea-Bissau -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Equatorial Guinea, Republic of -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Haiti -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Kiribati -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Philippines -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
173 Chad -1 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat
186 Tonga -2 DB17-20 methodology 2019 β€” flat

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Registering property: Equal access to property rights index (-2-0) by country. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-equal-access-to-property-rights-index-2-0-db17-20-methodology/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/registering-property-equal-access-to-property-rights-index-2-0-db17-20-methodology/">Registering property: Equal access to property rights index (-2-0) by country</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Registering property: Equal access to property rights index (-2-0) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 930 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The equal access to property rights index evaluates whether married or unmarried women have equal access to property rights. It has two components: (i) whether unmarried men and unmarΒ­ried women have equal ownership rights to property; and (ii) whether married men and married women have equal ownership rights to property. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.