Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Chile
Chile: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Chile, 2015–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Chile stood at 4 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
That places Chile 43rd out of 184 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Countries ranked near Chile
- 43 China 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 United States 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Russia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Antigua and Barbuda 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Armenia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Australia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Azerbaijan 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Bahrain 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Belarus 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Botswana 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Brunei 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Bulgaria 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Costa Rica 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Eswatini 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Gambia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Iran 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Iraq 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Ireland 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Israel 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Laos 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Latvia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Lebanon 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Malawi 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Maldives 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Mauritius 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Moldova 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Montenegro 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Norway 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Oman 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Philippines 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Poland 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Portugal 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Serbia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Seychelles 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Solomon Islands 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Thailand 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 United Arab Emirates 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 United Kingdom 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Uzbekistan 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Vanuatu 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 43 Palestine 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Chile
- Merchandise trade 55.9% (2025)
- Food imports 11.6% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 70.1% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 92.66 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 22.7% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 11.7% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 107.00 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 12.55 billion current US$ (2025)
- Transport services 36.0% (2025)
- Computer, communications and other services 37.2% (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Chile?
- Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Chile was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Chile rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Chile ranks 43rd out of 184 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.