Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Lebanon
Lebanon: Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. β¬ Flat
Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) in Lebanon, 2015β2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
Lebanon recorded 4 DB16-20 methodology for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 5 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over five years.
That places Lebanon 44th out of 186 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
Countries ranked near Lebanon
- 44 China 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 United States 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Russia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Antigua and Barbuda 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Armenia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Australia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Azerbaijan 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Bahrain 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Belarus 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Botswana 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Brunei 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Bulgaria 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Chile 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Costa Rica 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Eswatini 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Gambia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Iran 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Iraq 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Ireland 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Israel 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Laos 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Latvia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Malawi 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Maldives 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Mauritius 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Moldova 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Montenegro 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Norway 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Oman 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Philippines 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Poland 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Portugal 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Serbia 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Seychelles 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Solomon Islands 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Thailand 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 United Arab Emirates 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 United Kingdom 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Uzbekistan 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Vanuatu 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 44 Palestine 4 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Lebanon
- Merchandise trade 85.9% (2025)
- Food imports 18.5% (2024)
- Manufactures imports 40.0% (2024)
- Merchandise imports 21.67 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 19.1% (2024)
- Manufactures exports 55.6% (2024)
- Merchandise exports 4.60 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 7.89 billion current US$ (2023)
- Transport services 22.0% (2023)
- Computer, communications and other services 15.7% (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Lebanon?
- Registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) in Lebanon was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Lebanon?
- The highest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- What is the lowest registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8) recorded in Lebanon?
- The lowest recorded value was 4 DB16-20 methodology in 2015.
- How does Lebanon rank for registering property: geographic coverage index (0-8)?
- Lebanon ranks 44th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Lebanon data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Registering property: Geographic coverage index (0-8) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The geographic coverage index assesses the extent to which the land registry and cadastre provide complete geographic coverage of privately held land parcels. It has four components: (i) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the largest business city; (ii) how complete the coverage of the land registry is at the level of the economy; (iii) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the largest business city; and (iv) how complete the coverage of the mapping agency is at the level of the economy. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.