Chad vs Solomon Islands: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Chad
47.24
in 2019
Solomon Islands
49.47
in 2019
Chad rank
172nd
Solomon Islands rank
170th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Chad
  • Solomon Islands
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 49.47 against 47.24 in Chad, a difference of 2.23.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 172nd and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 188 countries.

Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Chad or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 49.47 against 47.24 in Chad as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Chad and Solomon Islands?
2.23, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Solomon Islands?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Chad and Solomon Islands rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Chad ranks 172nd and Solomon Islands ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.