China vs Sweden: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 78.05 against 77.33 in China, a difference of 0.72.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
China ranks 33rd and Sweden ranks 31st of 188 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, China or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 78.05 against 77.33 in China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between China and Sweden?
- 0.72, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China and Sweden rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- China ranks 33rd and Sweden ranks 31st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.