Comoros vs South Africa: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Comoros
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 68.32 against 67.98 in Comoros, a difference of 0.34.
Across all 6 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 97th of 188 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Comoros or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 68.32 against 67.98 in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Comoros and South Africa?
- 0.34, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Comoros and South Africa rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Comoros ranks 100th and South Africa ranks 97th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.