Ecuador vs Suriname: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Ecuador
66.42
in 2019
Suriname
66.33
in 2019
Ecuador rank
113th
Suriname rank
114th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ecuador
  • Suriname
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 66.42 against 66.33 in Suriname, a difference of 0.09.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Suriname ahead.

Ecuador ranks 113th and Suriname ranks 114th of 188 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Ecuador or Suriname?
Ecuador, at 66.42 against 66.33 in Suriname as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Ecuador and Suriname?
0.09, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Ecuador ranks 113th and Suriname ranks 114th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.