Equatorial Guinea vs Honduras: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score

Equatorial Guinea
55.01
in 2019
Honduras
56.17
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea rank
160th
Honduras rank
157th

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Honduras
0204060201420162019

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 56.17 against 55.01 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.16.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Honduras ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th and Honduras ranks 157th of 188 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Equatorial Guinea or Honduras?
Honduras, at 56.17 against 55.01 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Equatorial Guinea and Honduras?
1.16, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Honduras?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Honduras rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th and Honduras ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.