Latvia vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Latvia
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 73.51 against 73.48 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.03.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 56th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 58th of 190 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score, Latvia or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Latvia, at 73.51 against 73.48 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score between Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.03, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
- Latvia ranks 56th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 58th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.