Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Latvia

Latvia: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 73.51 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
73.51
Change on year
up 0.1%
World rank
56th
of 191 countries
All-time high
74.38
in 2014
All-time low
73.39
in 2016
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 74.42015: 73.42016: 73.42017: 73.42018: 73.52019: 73.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Latvia recorded 73.51 for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in 2019.

The figure is up 0.1% on the previous year and down 1.2% over ten years.

Latvia ranks 56th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Latvia, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 74.38 —
2015 73.39 -1.3%
2016 73.39 -0.0%
2017 73.41 +0.0%
2018 73.46 +0.1%
2019 73.51 +0.1%

Latvia compared with similar countries

  • Latvia's 73.51 is below the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 100% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Latvia's 73.51 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 73.51, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 53 Turkey 73.83 compare
  2. 54 Brunei 73.62 compare
  3. 55 Nigeria 73.61 compare
  4. 57 Malta 73.49 compare
  5. 58 Saint Kitts and Nevis 73.48 compare
  6. 59 Azerbaijan 73.36 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Latvia?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Latvia was 73.51 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 74.38 in 2014.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 73.39 in 2016.
How does Latvia rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Latvia ranks 56th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Latvia. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/latvia/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.