Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Canada

Canada: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 72.98 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
72.98
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
64th
of 191 countries
All-time high
73.87
in 2015
All-time low
72.87
in 2017
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Canada, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 73.82015: 73.92016: 73.82017: 72.92018: 732019: 73

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Canada is 72.98, measured in 2019.

The figure is down 1.2% over ten years.

That places Canada 64th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Canada, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Canada, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 73.84 —
2015 73.87 +0.0%
2016 73.83 -0.1%
2017 72.87 -1.3%
2018 72.95 +0.1%
2019 72.98 +0.0%

Canada compared with similar countries

  • Canada's 72.98 is below the median for high income countries, which is 73.56, 99% of the median. (62 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Canada

  1. 61 Mozambique 73.19 compare
  2. 62 Armenia 73.05 compare
  3. 63 Maldives 72.99 compare
  4. 65 Peru 72.53 compare
  5. 66 Sri Lanka 72.26 compare
  6. 67 Zambia 72.09 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Canada

All data for Canada →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Canada?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Canada was 72.98 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Canada?
The highest recorded value was 73.87 in 2015.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Canada?
The lowest recorded value was 72.87 in 2017.
How does Canada rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Canada ranks 64th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Canada?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Canada data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Canada. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/canada/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Canada</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.