Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Mali

Mali: Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score was 61.43 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
61.43
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
133rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
61.43
in 2019
All-time low
56.17
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Mali, 2014–2019

02040602014201620192014: 56.22015: 57.62016: 59.92017: 60.42018: 61.12019: 61.4

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Mali recorded 61.43 for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 9.4% over ten years.

Mali ranks 133rd of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Mali, year by year

Annual values for Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Mali, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 56.17 —
2015 57.65 +2.6%
2016 59.88 +3.9%
2017 60.44 +0.9%
2018 61.07 +1.0%
2019 61.43 +0.6%

Mali compared with similar countries

  • Mali's 61.43 is above the median for low income countries, which is 48.88, 1.3× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Mali's 61.43 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 62.6, 98% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Mali

  1. 130 Grenada 62.49 compare
  2. 131 Senegal 62.06 compare
  3. 132 Uzbekistan 61.68 compare
  4. 134 Congo 61.28 compare
  5. 135 Bangladesh 61.05 compare
  6. 136 Micronesia (country) 61.03 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More private sector data for Mali

All data for Mali →

Frequently asked questions

What is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Mali?
Dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score in Mali was 61.43 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Mali?
The highest recorded value was 61.43 in 2019.
What is the lowest dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score recorded in Mali?
The lowest recorded value was 56.17 in 2014.
How does Mali rank for dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score?
Mali ranks 133rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is dealing with construction permits (db16-20 methodology) - score rising or falling in Mali?
Over the last ten years it is up 9.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Mali data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Mali. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 October 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/stat/dealing-with-construction-permits-db16-20-methodology-score/mali/">Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Mali</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.