Dealing with construction: Liability and insurance in Austria
Austria: Dealing with construction: Liability and insurance was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes in Austria, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Austria stood at 2 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Austria ranks 1st of 186 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Dealing with construction: Liability and insurance in Austria, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Austria compared with similar countries
- Austria's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Austria's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Austria
- 1 China 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 India 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Indonesia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Albania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Algeria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Belgium 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bulgaria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cape Verde 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Chad 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Colombia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Hong Kong 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Israel 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Italy 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kuwait 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Lebanon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Luxembourg 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Malta 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mauritius 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mongolia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Morocco 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 New Zealand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Philippines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Rwanda 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Austria
- Merchandise trade 77.7% (2025)
- Food imports 9.7% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 74.7% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 228.39 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 98.05 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 8.9% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 77.7% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 222.03 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 104.54 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 24,112 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Austria?
- Dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Austria was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes recorded in Austria?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes recorded in Austria?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Austria rank for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Austria ranks 1st out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes rising or falling in Austria?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Austria data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.