Dealing with construction: Liability and insurance in Poland
Poland: Dealing with construction: Liability and insurance was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes in Poland, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Poland stood at 2 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Poland ranks 1st of 186 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Dealing with construction: Liability and insurance in Poland, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for high income countries, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Poland's 2 DB16-20 methodology is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1 DB16-20 methodology, 2.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Poland
- 1 China 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 India 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Indonesia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Albania 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Algeria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Austria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Belgium 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Benin 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bulgaria 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cape Verde 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Cameroon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Canada 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Chad 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Colombia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Congo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Egypt 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Hong Kong 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Israel 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Italy 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kuwait 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Lebanon 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Luxembourg 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Malta 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mauritius 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Mongolia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Morocco 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 New Zealand 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Philippines 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Rwanda 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Senegal 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Togo 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 Tunisia 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 2 DB16-20 methodology compare
More private sector data for Poland
- Merchandise trade 80.6% (2025)
- Food imports 9.9% (2025)
- Manufactures imports 77.0% (2025)
- Merchandise imports 420.91 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service imports 86.33 billion current US$ (2025)
- Food exports 15.6% (2025)
- Manufactures exports 77.8% (2025)
- Merchandise exports 413.89 billion current US$ (2025)
- Commercial service exports 130.41 billion current US$ (2025)
- Merchandise exports (current US$), per capita 11,360 current US$ per person (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Poland?
- Dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes in Poland was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Poland rank for dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes?
- Poland ranks 1st out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is dealing with construction permits: liability and insurance regimes rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Dealing with construction permits: Liability and insurance regimes index (0-2) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The liability and insurance regimes index evaluates the stringency of latent defect liability and insurance regimes. It has two components: (i) whether any parties involved in the construction process are held legally liable for latent defects such as structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use; (ii) whether any party involved in the construction process is legally required to obtain a latent defect liability or decennial (10 years) liability insurance policy to cover possible structural flaws or problems in the building once it is in use. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.